There are (25) Comments for the Bit Defender 2009 Antivirus Review Part 3
mafioso4842 says...
@adhryapple What does it mean? I don’t understand you.
Posted on: 18/Mar/2010@7:55 pm
adhryapple says...
Only Buy Version Protection…
Posted on: 21/Mar/2010@8:29 pm
ebildude123 says...
i use avast! u3 edition and mcafee virusscan usb for protection on my USB
Posted on: 24/Mar/2010@8:00 am
frankishpaladin1 says...
I think kaspersky’s firewall is best…but avira’s detection rate better…according to both av-comparative and virus bulletin test…………
and y shoud I waste 100mb of more memory?
and no AV can be regarded as no 1…
Posted on: 27/Mar/2010@2:07 am
ballader1 says...
I think kaspersky is better than avira, see matt’s video. Kaspersky is the best antivirus in the whole world.
Posted on: 29/Mar/2010@11:23 pm
xZOMBIExINFECTIONx says...
I think you all piss me off
Posted on: 31/Mar/2010@12:04 am
Idolpurist says...
I watched Mrizos Avast review B4 any other review!
Watched BOTH Avast reviews repeatedly. If U want to see Avast, Avira, etc reviews GO TO AV-Comparitives yourself and LOOK! Go to Avast’s website and see all their Awards from the various testing bodies. BTW, have YOU seen Mrizos reviews…ANY of them? He’s stated MANY TIMES that almost NONE of the AV’s that he’s tested has done well with ADWARE. Adware was where Avast was weak in his reviews. JUST LIKE ALMOST ALL THE REST! WAKE UP!!
Posted on: 2/Apr/2010@10:20 pm
mafioso4842 says...
I think Can you send me link to any of the AV-Comparitives where Avast have that high detection rate? Did you watch Avast review on mrizos channel? No? Then see it and result and you’ll be suprised.
Posted on: 4/Apr/2010@1:59 am
Idolpurist says...
Funny how an AV that doesn’t have H.I.P.S. detected CONFICKER Zero Hour, the DAY it debuted, BEFORE any other AV did. Strange how AV-Comparitives Year after Year ranks Avast at a 98 to 99% detection rate. Funny how Avast’s Generic Signatures can identify Malware, new or old, in a manner similar to, but not the same as Heuristics. The bottom line is Avast does what works for the customer.
And it’s working WELL! Independent testing bodies Consistently rate Avast in the Top 3 all the time. Peace.
Posted on: 5/Apr/2010@1:05 pm
imafanofamylee says...
..and avast v5 have hips technology!!!
Posted on: 7/Apr/2010@8:23 pm
hahahohohi9845 says...
Avast FTW
Posted on: 8/Apr/2010@10:20 am
frankishpaladin1 says...
THANkx mate..well am using avira premium now… strongest database..its webshiled so strong i never found in other AV..u r right..avast sometime fails….but I am sure avira may detect some false positives(mainly not necessary tracking cookies) but will not allow single virus..
Posted on: 8/Apr/2010@1:16 pm
hax0rman101 says...
so does kaspersky. avast is too old, it relys on signatures too much nowadays. It used to be the best thing back in the old days but now malware have gotten a lot smarter. The new avast (version 5) looks pretty neat though
Posted on: 11/Apr/2010@12:32 am
tazss159 says...
I think bit defender sucks hardcore
Posted on: 13/Apr/2010@9:43 am
mafioso4842 says...
I think I don’t feel i wasted money for Kaspersky. More – if I can choose between free Avast and payable Kaspersky – I’d choose Kaspersky no matter what. But if somebody don’t have money they must choose Avast or Avira becouse these are the best free AVs you can get.
Posted on: 15/Apr/2010@1:09 pm
frankishpaladin1 says...
I think avast also have web security thus called web shiled actually it has 8 type of shield including residencial shield..that means the scanning of ur files are on going even if u dont scan manually..well no antivirus made yet can completely remove all trojans….so some antimalware(thats also free for on demand scan)requires.
so when it comes Q-n of paying paying ur hard earned money y waste untill one can get best security (at least better than other)for free?thank you
Posted on: 18/Apr/2010@2:46 pm
mafioso4842 says...
I think Btw. – did you saw Avast review? It can’t handle viruses.
Posted on: 21/Apr/2010@4:58 pm
mafioso4842 says...
I think Boot time scan? Kaspersky can easily delete viruses even without restart and if he can not handle it now it can restart and threats are gone. p2p shield? Kaspersky have Web Security and attack blocker modules. Avira and Avast are just signature based AVs – they don’t have something like HIPS – detecting threats based on behaviour. Thank you.
Posted on: 25/Apr/2010@2:49 am
frankishpaladin1 says...
I think btw avast has p2p shield+boot time scan which kaspersky dont have
Posted on: 25/Apr/2010@5:21 am
frankishpaladin1 says...
no sorry its ppl like u who thinks paid antivirus’s are better than free ones..avira and avast both have better detection rate than kav(av comparative org)
kaspersky/kis has good firewall but all total it slows down surfing speed.I have tried like 1 dozen AV-s..and tested like this video’s uploader did..though everyone has own choice!
Posted on: 26/Apr/2010@10:02 am
mafioso4842 says...
You don’t know what your’re saying. I’m guessing that you NEVER used Kaspersky… Avast is good BECOUSE it’s free and if you’d have some money for Kaspersky then you’d change your mind.
Posted on: 27/Apr/2010@12:34 am
sinestar10 says...
avast is the best antivirus of all fucken kaspersky avg etc>>>>
Posted on: 27/Apr/2010@1:30 am
darkmastachief says...
well when i said most powerful i didn’t mean like server powerful i ment just slightly more powerful therefore uses more resources since it has 8 realtime scanners and the others have 4 or 5
Posted on: 28/Apr/2010@10:58 pm
frankishpaladin1 says...
I think avast with a good firewall and malwarebytes antimalware(antyspyware)
avg never!
Posted on: 29/Apr/2010@2:23 pm
srakso2 says...
I played I game where you squish bugs with a hammer on a piece of glass
@adhryapple What does it mean? I don’t understand you.
Only Buy Version Protection…
i use avast! u3 edition and mcafee virusscan usb for protection on my USB
I think kaspersky’s firewall is best…but avira’s detection rate better…according to both av-comparative and virus bulletin test…………
and y shoud I waste 100mb of more memory?
and no AV can be regarded as no 1…
I think kaspersky is better than avira, see matt’s video. Kaspersky is the best antivirus in the whole world.
I think you all piss me off
I watched Mrizos Avast review B4 any other review!
Watched BOTH Avast reviews repeatedly. If U want to see Avast, Avira, etc reviews GO TO AV-Comparitives yourself and LOOK! Go to Avast’s website and see all their Awards from the various testing bodies. BTW, have YOU seen Mrizos reviews…ANY of them? He’s stated MANY TIMES that almost NONE of the AV’s that he’s tested has done well with ADWARE. Adware was where Avast was weak in his reviews. JUST LIKE ALMOST ALL THE REST! WAKE UP!!
I think Can you send me link to any of the AV-Comparitives where Avast have that high detection rate? Did you watch Avast review on mrizos channel? No? Then see it and result and you’ll be suprised.
Funny how an AV that doesn’t have H.I.P.S. detected CONFICKER Zero Hour, the DAY it debuted, BEFORE any other AV did. Strange how AV-Comparitives Year after Year ranks Avast at a 98 to 99% detection rate. Funny how Avast’s Generic Signatures can identify Malware, new or old, in a manner similar to, but not the same as Heuristics. The bottom line is Avast does what works for the customer.
And it’s working WELL! Independent testing bodies Consistently rate Avast in the Top 3 all the time. Peace.
..and avast v5 have hips technology!!!
Avast FTW
THANkx mate..well am using avira premium now… strongest database..its webshiled so strong i never found in other AV..u r right..avast sometime fails….but I am sure avira may detect some false positives(mainly not necessary tracking cookies) but will not allow single virus..
so does kaspersky. avast is too old, it relys on signatures too much nowadays. It used to be the best thing back in the old days but now malware have gotten a lot smarter. The new avast (version 5) looks pretty neat though
I think bit defender sucks hardcore
I think I don’t feel i wasted money for Kaspersky. More – if I can choose between free Avast and payable Kaspersky – I’d choose Kaspersky no matter what. But if somebody don’t have money they must choose Avast or Avira becouse these are the best free AVs you can get.
I think avast also have web security thus called web shiled actually it has 8 type of shield including residencial shield..that means the scanning of ur files are on going even if u dont scan manually..well no antivirus made yet can completely remove all trojans….so some antimalware(thats also free for on demand scan)requires.
so when it comes Q-n of paying paying ur hard earned money y waste untill one can get best security (at least better than other)for free?thank you
I think Btw. – did you saw Avast review? It can’t handle viruses.
I think Boot time scan? Kaspersky can easily delete viruses even without restart and if he can not handle it now it can restart and threats are gone. p2p shield? Kaspersky have Web Security and attack blocker modules. Avira and Avast are just signature based AVs – they don’t have something like HIPS – detecting threats based on behaviour. Thank you.
I think btw avast has p2p shield+boot time scan which kaspersky dont have
no sorry its ppl like u who thinks paid antivirus’s are better than free ones..avira and avast both have better detection rate than kav(av comparative org)
kaspersky/kis has good firewall but all total it slows down surfing speed.I have tried like 1 dozen AV-s..and tested like this video’s uploader did..though everyone has own choice!
You don’t know what your’re saying. I’m guessing that you NEVER used Kaspersky… Avast is good BECOUSE it’s free and if you’d have some money for Kaspersky then you’d change your mind.
avast is the best antivirus of all fucken kaspersky avg etc>>>>
well when i said most powerful i didn’t mean like server powerful i ment just slightly more powerful therefore uses more resources since it has 8 realtime scanners and the others have 4 or 5
I think avast with a good firewall and malwarebytes antimalware(antyspyware)
avg never!
I played I game where you squish bugs with a hammer on a piece of glass